Another Look at Deceit

I find myself stopping, while reading about Carl Jung, to look at his picture once again. He did not look crazy. He looks intelligent, well-dressed and someone I would have never put in the same category at first glance with the tattoo-covered beach bums at Venice Beach. Yet, his spirituality was the same. Here he is speaking on death:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOxlZm2AU4o

In this man's "god-like" narcissistic mind, there was no punishment awaiting him for 40 YEARS OF ADULTERY WITH HIS MISTRESS. It was reported that the mistress and the wife had problems between them. Imagine that! I feel sorry for the mistress, and I feel sorry for any wife who would stay with such a man. Of course, divorce was not as common as it is today in the early to mid 1900s. The arrogance of Carl Jung's spirituality was not based on science. Even the scientific community realized that he was teaching more spirituality than science, and his religion was much like Helena Blavatsky's theosophy. (It is obvious that demons were dictating her automatic hand written messages; demons are much smarter than people, and the covenants of theosophy were not written simply, though the message was the same old lie from the garden of Eden: ye shall be like God.)

As I am reading about Carl Jung, it reminds me of my book, Messiah or Madman, about L. Ron Hubbard. He thought he was a god, too. Carl Jung considered polygamy as a viable alternative to divorce, and with no Law other than his own heart to guide him, it is reported he was a totally different man behind the scenes than the public knew. Just like the corn-roll-haired psychics of Venice Beach, Jung had absolute confidence in his beliefs, as far as I have read (though he said he could not simply "believe" in something, implying he had to "know" it was true.) So, did he "know" adultery was right? Did he "know" that his spirituality was benign? It seems to me he had plenty of faith in his own rebellion to the Bible. There was absolutely no contrition over sin or conviction to repent. He looked at Christians and everyone who had not undergone psychoanalysis as "unenlightened." So, the "lost" people were the ones living according to the Bible in his book.

Guess this next video explains a lot. Carl Jung did not believe in Satan evidently. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wop91_Gvwos&feature=related

Even if there was no saving Gospel, I would never want to follow a man like Carl Jung. I called my counselor today (a woman with whom I speak on a regular basis about my life) and told her about all I was reading about Carl Jung and asked her, "Was there ever a time he taught anything good?" This walking around speaking in a woman's voice some of the time, automatic handwriting, dreams of him being some sort of perverted Christ, and living a private life to betray his public life was sure egotistical. Wasn't he supposed to be leaving his ego in all his psychoanalysis? If he was a god, he was sure a lying one.